Skip to Quick Proof Menu
Construction Forensic Intelligence Group (CFIG) • Guided Proof Portfolio 10 of 13

Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 — Completion, Startup, and Prudence Intelligence

A Guided Proof demonstration of how schedule margin, startup risk, cost growth, responsibility, public oversight, and a continue-or-restructure decision can be joined without exposing protected plant information.

ProjectPlant Vogtle Units 3 and 4
LocationWaynesboro, Georgia
Regulatory oversightGeorgia Public Service Commission and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Primary conditionRisk-adjusted schedule margin narrowed during completion and startup
Unit 3 commercial operationJuly 31, 2023
Unit 4 commercial operationApril 29, 2024
Primary recordGeorgia Public Service Commission construction monitoring testimony
Review boundaryHigh-level public oversight only
Controlled Version 1.0
Validation Question

Could CFIG have joined shrinking schedule margin, untested work, startup risk, cost growth, and public responsibility into one high-level decision record?

Yes. Public commission testimony tracked reduced risk-adjusted schedule margin while secondary systems and components still required testing. Later public filings and operating records show the cost-recovery and final completion decisions.

Evidence posture: Direct official support for a risk-adjusted margin reduction, remaining test and startup risk, stated cost positions, commission cost-recovery action, and the later commercial operation of both units.
Portfolio purposeThis project demonstrates high-level nuclear megaproject decision intelligence. It shows how CFIG can join schedule risk, startup gates, cost growth, prudence, and responsibility using only safe public oversight records.
Controlled Guided Proof EditionTF-CFIG-VOG-GP-010 · Version 1.0 · Human Authority: Carl Wilson · September 4, 2026
CFIG Quick Proof and Guided Tour

What CFIG Discovered + Its Significance = Tangible Options

Project Purpose and Scope

Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 added two nuclear generating units in Georgia. The project required years of construction, testing, regulatory oversight, financing, and eventual commercial operation. This public-record portfolio tests how shrinking schedule margin during late construction and startup could be connected to cost forecasts, responsibility, commission review, and authorized completion decisions.

Portfolio Highlights

This portfolio places particular attention on:

  • Phase 5 — Guaranteed Maximum Price and Cost Formation: Trace forecasts, project cost, recovery requests, and commission prudence review; the portfolio does not assert a project-wide guaranteed maximum price.
  • Phase 6 — Construction and Project Controls: Read risk-adjusted schedule margin, testing, and completion forecasts together in the dated monitoring testimony.
  • Phase 7 — Changes and Claims: Keep commercial responsibility and cost-recovery positions tied to public filings and decisions, without determining legal entitlement.
  • Phase 8 — Closeout, Warranty and Operations: Separate startup and regulatory gates from the later documented commercial-operation outcomes.

These phases show why late-project schedule and cost intelligence had to remain dated and connected to the responsible decision authorities. The full eight-phase guide identifies supporting early-phase evidence and its limits. CFIG did not participate in this project or exercise nuclear or regulatory authority; the analysis is retrospective.

Emphasized phases are shown in green and gold.

Evidence Reviewed

Georgia Public Service Commission monitoring and prudence filings, its public docket, and official plant-operation records.

What CFIG Discovered

Contemporaneous public testimony identified narrow risk-adjusted schedule margin while important Unit 3 testing and startup work remained.

Significance

A small margin could affect completion forecasts, cost exposure, commercial responsibility, and public oversight decisions.

Decision Window

When monitoring testimony reported the shrinking margin, before later startup and regulatory gates were completed.

CFIG Response

Assemble a public-safe schedule-and-startup dashboard, cost responsibility ledger, and authorized options book.

Consequences of Taking No Action

Separate forecasts could obscure a narrowing margin or leave cost and decision responsibility hard to trace.

Controlled statusApproved controlled redesign based on completed public regulatory, oversight, and commercial-operation records.
Professional boundaryThis is a high-level public-record demonstration. It excludes nonpublic plant data, protected security information, safeguards information, detailed layouts, operating vulnerabilities, and independent nuclear engineering or safety judgments.
START THE GUIDED PROOF TOUR EXPLORE ALL EIGHT PHASES

Interactive Proof Chain

Select any stage for its supporting detail, or follow the chain from 1 through 9.

GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 1 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: What CFIG Reviewed

What CFIG Reviewed

CFIG began with the named public records and stated the review limit before drawing a conclusion.

Reviewed core

Georgia Public Service Commission construction-monitoring testimony and prudence filings, the commission docket and decision record, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Unit 4 status, and Georgia Power commercial-operation notices.

Review boundary

Only public, high-level oversight and outcome records were used. No protected, security-sensitive, proprietary, detailed technical, or nonpublic project information was sought or used.

Source setTwenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony; Georgia Power prudence filing; Thirtieth Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report; Georgia Public Service Commission docket 29849; Nuclear Regulatory Commission — Vogtle Unit 4; Georgia Power — Unit 4 commercial operation
Review dateSeptember 4, 2026
Evidence postureDirect official support for a risk-adjusted margin reduction, remaining test and startup risk, stated cost positions, commission cost-recovery action, and the later commercial operation of both units.
Full recordSource Register and Coverage Ledger below the tour.
GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 2 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: What CFIG Discovered

What CFIG Discovered

CFIG connected separate facts into one clear decision condition.

1 · Margin lossRisk-adjusted schedule margin fell from months to about four weeks.
2 · Startup riskTesting and initial operation could still uncover new work.
3 · Cost traceCompletion cost and requested public recovery required a dated evidence trail.
4 · Public decisionRegulators and owner executives needed a bounded record for completion and responsibility decisions.

WHAT CFIG DISCOVERED, CONNECTED, OR WOULD ENABLE

CFIG connected reduced schedule margin, remaining testing, likely startup discoveries, cost growth, public prudence review, responsibility, and the later commercial-operation outcome.

GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 3 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Verify the Exact Source

Verify the Exact Source

The exact source is placed here so the reader does not need to hunt through the full record.

Exact evidence card

WHAT THE SOURCE SAYS

Twenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony — Georgia Public Service Commission docket 29849

Physical PDF page 15, printed testimony page 14, lines 376–389.

“the RAS margin to the Site Working Plan has decreased from 3.5 months to approximately 4 weeks”

PLAIN-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION

The time cushion for the working plan became much smaller.

What CFIG detected or connectedA small schedule cushion remained while testing and startup could still find problems, so the completion date and cost forecast carried material risk.
Lifecycle phaseConstruction and Project Controls; Changes, Claims, Disputes, and Commercial Resolution; Closeout, Warranty, Audit, and Final Resolution.
Project effectTime, cost, ratepayer exposure, responsibility, regulatory decisions, and project outcome.
Evidence statusDirect public commission testimony; no independent nuclear safety or engineering conclusion is offered.
OPEN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 4 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Significance

Significance

The condition matters because it can move through cost, time, responsibility, safety, or project outcome.

Time effect

A small margin meant one startup or test problem could move the working completion plan.

Cost effect

Extended construction, correction, testing, and financing could increase owner and ratepayer exposure.

Responsibility effect

Owner, contractor, regulator, monitor, finance, and professional teams held different parts of the completion and cost record.

Benefit effect

One safe, high-level record supports faster escalation, clearer cost responsibility, and stronger public decisions.

Lifecycle movementPublic need and authorization → Design and procurement → Construction → Test and startup → Risk-adjusted completion → Prudence and cost recovery → Commercial operation.
Primary benefitGives executives and regulators one bounded record for completion risk, cost responsibility, and public decisions.
GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 5 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Decision Window

Decision Window

The useful time to act was before the next commitment made the problem harder or more costly to change.

Early windowWhen estimates, contracts, designs, modules, and schedules first showed material variance.
Best action windowWhen risk-adjusted schedule margin narrowed to about four weeks while testing and startup work remained.
Startup windowBefore each major test, fuel-load, operating, and commercial-operation gate.
Public decision windowBefore prudence, cost-recovery, financing, and responsibility decisions became final.
GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 6 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Action CFIG Would Take

Action CFIG Would Take

CFIG would turn the evidence into three separate work products that a responsible person can use.

PRIMARY TANGIBLE OPTION 1 OF 3

Risk-Adjusted Completion and Startup Gate Dashboard

Usable output
A public-safe dashboard of milestone, current forecast, risk-adjusted range, margin, remaining test class, issue trend, decision gate, owner, and confidence without sensitive plant detail.
Responsible user
Owner executives, program controls, independent monitors, regulators, finance, and Human Authority.
Decision enabled
Whether the completion forecast is supportable and which high-level risk needs escalation, recovery, or contingency.
Expected result
Leaders see margin and remaining startup exposure in the same frame.

Benefit: Earlier action on schedule and cost risk without exposing protected information.

PRIMARY TANGIBLE OPTION 2 OF 3

Cost Growth, Responsibility, and Prudence Traceability Ledger

Usable output
A dated public-record ledger joining approved baseline, forecast, drivers, notice, management action, responsibility position, commission evidence, recovery treatment, and unresolved item.
Responsible user
Commission staff, owner finance, counsel, auditors, consumer representatives, and executives.
Decision enabled
Which cost is supported, disputed, deferred, allocated, investigated, or proposed for recovery.
Expected result
Each material public cost position points to its evidence and decision status.

Benefit: Clearer accountability and a more reviewable ratepayer record.

PRIMARY TANGIBLE OPTION 3 OF 3

Continue, Restructure, or Stop Decision Book

Usable output
A controlled executive book comparing continue, change sequence or commercial structure, add oversight, defer, or stop using cost, time, safety authority, reliability, legal duty, and public consequence.
Responsible user
Owner board and executives, regulators, finance, counsel, public authorities, and Human Authority.
Decision enabled
Which lawful path should proceed at each material decision gate.
Expected result
Major commitments are made from a named option set and current evidence.

Benefit: Better protection of public, owner, and ratepayer interests.

Control rule: These are three separate usable outputs. Carl Wilson, as Human Authority, decides which output is released and how it is used.
GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 7 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Decision Makers and Actions Enabled

Decision Makers and Actions Enabled

Each output has a named user and a clear decision. Human Authority remains in control.

Owner executives and boardSet the completion path, risk tolerance, and recovery action.
Commission and independent monitorsTest the public forecast, cost position, prudence evidence, and decision record.
Program controls and financeJoin schedule margin, cost, issue trend, financing, and responsibility.
Licensed and authorized professionalsRetain all technical, nuclear, safety, security, and regulatory judgments.
Decision questionShould the current completion path continue, be restructured, receive added controls, be deferred, or stop at the next lawful gate?
Decision recordA public-safe decision book with forecast, risk-adjusted margin, cost trace, responsibility position, alternatives, authority, and signed outcome.
Human AuthorityCarl Wilson controls final use, release, and escalation.
GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 8 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Consequences of Taking No Action

Consequences of Taking No Action

If the condition is not controlled, the project can lose time, money, leverage, safety, or operating value.

Forecast surprise

A small margin can disappear when testing or startup identifies more work.

Cost growth

Late correction, extended work, and financing can increase exposure before responsibility is settled.

Weak public trace

A cost or schedule position can be hard to test if its source, date, assumption, and decision are separated.

Boundary failure

Unsafe handling of protected plant information would create a new risk and is prohibited in this demonstration.

GUIDED PROOF TOUR — STEP 9 OF 9YOU ARE HERE: Verify the Finding Against Source Records

Verify the Finding Against Source Records

The proof chain below connects the claim to the exact public record and states the evidence limit.

SourceTwenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony — Georgia Public Service Commission docket 29849
Exact locationPhysical PDF page 15, printed testimony page 14, lines 376–389.
Condition foundCFIG connected reduced schedule margin, remaining testing, likely startup discoveries, cost growth, public prudence review, responsibility, and the later commercial-operation outcome.
CFIG interventionMaintain a high-level risk-adjusted gate dashboard, trace cost growth to dated responsibility evidence, and give decision-makers a controlled continue, restructure, or stop record.
Three Tangible OptionsRisk-Adjusted Completion and Startup Gate Dashboard; Cost Growth, Responsibility, and Prudence Traceability Ledger; Continue, Restructure, or Stop Decision Book
DecisionShould the current completion path continue, be restructured, receive added controls, be deferred, or stop at the next lawful gate?
Expected resultGives executives and regulators one bounded record for completion risk, cost responsibility, and public decisions.
Evidence statusDirect official support for a risk-adjusted margin reduction, remaining test and startup risk, stated cost positions, commission cost-recovery action, and the later commercial operation of both units.

Verification card

WHAT THE SOURCE SAYS

Twenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony — Georgia Public Service Commission docket 29849

Physical PDF page 15, printed testimony page 14, lines 376–389.

“the RAS margin to the Site Working Plan has decreased from 3.5 months to approximately 4 weeks”

PLAIN-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION

The time cushion for the working plan became much smaller.

What CFIG detected or connectedA small schedule cushion remained while testing and startup could still find problems, so the completion date and cost forecast carried material risk.
Lifecycle phaseConstruction and Project Controls; Changes, Claims, Disputes, and Commercial Resolution; Closeout, Warranty, Audit, and Final Resolution.
Project effectTime, cost, ratepayer exposure, responsibility, regulatory decisions, and project outcome.
Evidence statusDirect public commission testimony; no independent nuclear safety or engineering conclusion is offered.
OPEN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
Boundary: This is a high-level public-record demonstration. It excludes nonpublic plant data, protected security information, safeguards information, detailed layouts, operating vulnerabilities, and independent nuclear engineering or safety judgments.
Complete Portfolio Evidence and Lifecycle Record

Continue into the full supporting portfolio

The guided tour gives the short answer. The record below preserves the project purpose, source coverage, lifecycle analysis, three Tangible Options, limits, and Human Authority.

OPEN THE FIRST FULL-PORTFOLIO SECTION
Reader Guide

Why this project is in the CFIG demonstration set

Demonstration purposeThis project demonstrates high-level nuclear megaproject decision intelligence. It shows how CFIG can join schedule risk, startup gates, cost growth, prudence, and responsibility using only safe public oversight records.

Primary CFIG capability

Risk-adjusted completion, startup-gate, and public-cost traceability.

Decision sweet spot

When risk-adjusted schedule margin fell to about four weeks while significant testing and startup work remained.

Client payoff

Gives executives and regulators one bounded record for completion risk, cost responsibility, and public decisions.

This is an independent historical demonstration built from public records. It does not claim CFIG worked on, advised, or was endorsed by the project.

Executive Summary

One condition. One decision path. Three usable outputs.

A narrow risk-adjusted schedule margin existed while important testing and startup work remained, so schedule, cost, responsibility, and decision exposure had to be read together.

ConditionCFIG connected reduced schedule margin, remaining testing, likely startup discoveries, cost growth, public prudence review, responsibility, and the later commercial-operation outcome.
InterventionMaintain a high-level risk-adjusted gate dashboard, trace cost growth to dated responsibility evidence, and give decision-makers a controlled continue, restructure, or stop record.
BenefitGives executives and regulators one bounded record for completion risk, cost responsibility, and public decisions.

Primary evidence spine

WHAT THE SOURCE SAYS

Twenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony — Georgia Public Service Commission docket 29849

Physical PDF page 15, printed testimony page 14, lines 376–389.

“the RAS margin to the Site Working Plan has decreased from 3.5 months to approximately 4 weeks”

PLAIN-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION

The time cushion for the working plan became much smaller.

What CFIG detected or connectedA small schedule cushion remained while testing and startup could still find problems, so the completion date and cost forecast carried material risk.
Lifecycle phaseConstruction and Project Controls; Changes, Claims, Disputes, and Commercial Resolution; Closeout, Warranty, Audit, and Final Resolution.
Project effectTime, cost, ratepayer exposure, responsibility, regulatory decisions, and project outcome.
Evidence statusDirect public commission testimony; no independent nuclear safety or engineering conclusion is offered.
OPEN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
Source Register and Coverage Ledger

What was reviewed—and what remains outside the claim

The register names each public record used here. “Targeted” means the listed project sections were reviewed for this demonstration. It does not mean every linked attachment or all project files were reviewed.

IDOriginal document and exact areaCoverage usedStatusPublic source
S1Twenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony
Physical PDF page 15, printed page 14, lines 376–389; schedule margin, testing, and startup risk.		Targeted public testimony reviewed.VERIFIEDOpen original source
S2Georgia Power prudence filing
Physical PDF page 9 on cost positions; physical pages 60–61 on stipulated cost-recovery terms.		Targeted cost and decision sections reviewed.VERIFIEDOpen original source
S3Thirtieth Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report
Unit 3 commercial-operation status, Unit 4 completion forecast, and remaining startup risk.		Targeted monitoring sections reviewed.VERIFIEDOpen original source
S4Georgia Public Service Commission docket 29849
Public docket and final commission record.		Docket identity and public decision trail reviewed.VERIFIEDOpen original source
S5Nuclear Regulatory Commission — Vogtle Unit 4
Public licensing and operating status page.		Public outcome status reviewed.VERIFIEDOpen original source
S6Georgia Power — Unit 4 commercial operation
April 29, 2024 official announcement; includes Unit 3 date.		Commercial-operation outcome reviewed.VERIFIEDOpen original source
Full Project Lifecycle · Evidence Boundaries

Explore Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 across all eight phases

The public record supports cost and schedule oversight through late construction and later commercial milestones. Each phase links to a source or states the limits of the available public material.

Guided proof menuOpen Vogtle companion reportReturn to portfolio gallery
Phase 1 · Existing site context

Land / Site Acquisition

Evidence reviewed: Public licensing and monitoring materials identify the Vogtle site and Units 3 and 4. The reviewed set is not a land title or acquisition audit.

Decision use and limit: Keep site and licensing context distinct from an unsupported acquisition claim.

Open source registerAll eight phases
Phase 2 · Public need and oversight context

Planning / Project Definition

Evidence reviewed: Commission records describe the project baseline, authority, cost, schedule, and public oversight through the reporting period.

Decision use and limit: Set an owner-approved risk-adjusted baseline and escalation threshold in each dated decision.

Open source registerAll eight phases
Phase 3 · High-level design evidence only

Design / Preconstruction

Evidence reviewed: Public monitoring reports discuss design and construction drivers; protected engineering and security material are outside this portfolio.

Decision use and limit: Trace public design maturity and change effects without rendering technical nuclear safety judgments.

Open evidence limitsAll eight phases
Phase 4 · Commercial structure context

Contract / Procurement

Evidence reviewed: Public filings address commercial responsibility and later changes, but not every executed contract term or confidential procurement record.

Decision use and limit: Tie named duties and approvals to dated source material before a cost or schedule decision.

Open source registerAll eight phases
Phase 5 · Strong public cost evidence; no verified GMP

Guaranteed Maximum Price / Cost Formation

Evidence reviewed: Commission filings document project forecasts, cost recovery, prudence positions, and later decisions. This portfolio does not assert a single project-wide guaranteed maximum price.

Decision use and limit: Keep a dated ledger distinguishing forecast, requested recovery, stipulated amount, and commission action.

Open verification stepAll eight phases
Phase 6 · Strong monitoring evidence

Construction / Project Controls

Evidence reviewed: Twenty-Seventh monitoring testimony discusses Unit 3 risk-adjusted schedule margin while testing and startup activities remained. Later records document the subsequent milestones and must not be read back into the earlier decision window.

Decision use and limit: Escalate a high-level completion gate showing margin, open work, forecast range, and responsible authority.

Open exact testimonyAll eight phases
Phase 7 · Public prudence evidence; entitlement limited

Changes / Claims / Disputes

Evidence reviewed: Public filings and proceedings address cost responsibility and recovery positions. This portfolio is not a legal entitlement determination or complete claims audit.

Decision use and limit: Track each material position, dated support, counter-position, and authorized decision.

Open source registerAll eight phases
Phase 8 · Commercial operation documented; warranty limited

Closeout / Warranty / Operations

Evidence reviewed: Official regulatory and Georgia Power records document later unit milestones and Unit 4 commercial operation. The public set is not a complete warranty, plant-acceptance, or operational safety audit.

Decision use and limit: Record the transition from monitored construction to authorized operation while reserving technical certification to regulators and licensed operators.

Open verification stepAll eight phases
Open the existing phase-by-phase ledgerReturn to guided proof
Complete Portfolio Evidence and Lifecycle Record

The eight CFIG lifecycle phases

A phase may be evidence-supported, supporting, or requirements-only. No blank phase is presented as completed field proof.

PhaseCoverage statusProject evidenceCFIG use
1. Land and Site AcquisitionSUPPORTINGPublic licensing and project records identify the existing nuclear site and authorized units.Carry site, permit, utility, environmental, and public-authority gates at a safe public level.
2. Planning and Project DefinitionEVIDENCE-SUPPORTEDNeed, authorization, budget, schedule, technology, and public oversight appear in the monitoring record.Set baseline, decision authority, risk-adjusted range, and stop or restructure gates.
3. Design and PreconstructionSUPPORTINGPublic monitoring describes design and construction drivers without requiring protected detail.Trace high-level design maturity and change effect; leave technical judgments to authorized professionals.
4. Contract and ProcurementEVIDENCE-SUPPORTEDPublic filings address commercial structure, responsibility, and later changes.Join commercial duty, change, schedule, cost, and proof in the responsibility ledger.
5. Guaranteed Maximum Price, Cost Formation, and PurchasingEVIDENCE-SUPPORTEDBaseline, forecast, requested recovery, stipulated amount, and public commission actions are documented.Use the Cost Growth, Responsibility, and Prudence Traceability Ledger.
6. Construction and Project ControlsEVIDENCE-SUPPORTEDCommission monitoring tracks progress, margin, forecast, testing, and risk.Use the public-safe Risk-Adjusted Completion and Startup Gate Dashboard.
7. Changes, Claims, Disputes, and Commercial ResolutionEVIDENCE-SUPPORTEDPublic cost, responsibility, financing, and recovery positions changed through formal proceedings.Keep each material position tied to dated evidence and authority.
8. Closeout, Warranty, Audit, and Final ResolutionEVIDENCE-SUPPORTEDPublic records show Unit 3 and Unit 4 commercial operation and continuing commission review.Close public completion gates while preserving open audit, cost, and regulatory matters.
Detailed Findings

Source language beside plain language

VOG-01Risk-adjusted margin became small while work remainedSCHEDULE / STARTUP

WHAT THE SOURCE SAYS

Twenty-Seventh Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report testimony

“decreased from 3.5 months to approximately 4 weeks”

Physical PDF page 15, printed page 14, lines 376–389.

Open original source

PLAIN-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION

The working schedule had much less room for a problem.

WHAT CFIG DISCOVERED, CONNECTED, OR WOULD ENABLE

Condition Found

A narrow time cushion remained while tests and startup could still identify new work.

Significance

One issue could move completion and add cost.

Lifecycle Effect

Construction → Test → Startup → Commercial operation.

Decision Window

When the risk-adjusted margin narrowed and before later startup gates.

CFIG Intervention

Use the Risk-Adjusted Completion and Startup Gate Dashboard.

Responsible User

Owner executives, program controls, monitors, commission staff, and finance.

Consequences of Taking No Action

The forecast can look firm even when little risk margin remains.

Expected Benefit

Leaders see the completion range and remaining risk together.

Evidence status: Direct public commission testimony; no nuclear safety conclusion.
VOG-02Cost recovery required a traceable responsibility recordCOST / PRUDENCE

WHAT THE SOURCE SAYS

Georgia Power prudence filing

“Georgia Power’s total share of the Project’s cost is projected to be $10.188 billion”

Physical PDF page 9, cost-position summary.

Open original source

PLAIN-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION

The owner gave the commission a large final cost position for review.

WHAT CFIG DISCOVERED, CONNECTED, OR WOULD ENABLE

Condition Found

Baseline, growth, claimed responsibility, and allowed recovery were not the same number or decision.

Significance

Public cost decisions need a clear link to facts, duty, action, and authority.

Lifecycle Effect

Baseline → Cost growth → Filing → Review → Stipulation or order → Recovery.

Decision Window

Before each material prudence and cost-recovery ruling.

CFIG Intervention

Use the Cost Growth, Responsibility, and Prudence Traceability Ledger.

Responsible User

Commission, owner finance, counsel, auditors, and public representatives.

Consequences of Taking No Action

Different cost positions can be confused or lose their evidence trail.

Expected Benefit

Each public dollar position becomes easier to test and decide.

Evidence status: Official filing; CFIG offers no independent prudence or legal conclusion.
VOG-03Completion and public decisions needed one option setDECISION / OUTCOME

WHAT THE SOURCE SAYS

Georgia Public Service Commission docket and official operating records

“Unit 4 entered commercial operation on April 29, 2024”

Georgia Power official Unit 4 announcement; cross-check with federal and commission records.

Open original source

PLAIN-LANGUAGE TRANSLATION

The last new unit began serving customers in April 2024.

WHAT CFIG DISCOVERED, CONNECTED, OR WOULD ENABLE

Condition Found

The final outcome followed years of completion, cost, oversight, and responsibility decisions.

Significance

A known outcome does not remove the need to show what could be decided at each earlier gate.

Lifecycle Effect

Monitor → Decide → Complete → Operate → Continue public review.

Decision Window

At each major commitment, startup, recovery, and final cost gate.

CFIG Intervention

Use the Continue, Restructure, or Stop Decision Book.

Responsible User

Owner board, executives, regulators, finance, counsel, and public authorities.

Consequences of Taking No Action

Large decisions can appear automatic instead of showing the real alternatives and authority.

Expected Benefit

A reviewable record explains why the chosen path advanced.

Evidence status: Commercial-operation outcome is official; earlier alternatives are CFIG decision framing.
Tangible Options

Exactly three primary outputs

Each option is a usable work product. It names the user, the decision, and the payoff.

No.Tangible OptionUsable outputUserDecision enabledBenefit
1Risk-Adjusted Completion and Startup Gate DashboardA public-safe dashboard of milestone, current forecast, risk-adjusted range, margin, remaining test class, issue trend, decision gate, owner, and confidence without sensitive plant detail.Owner executives, program controls, independent monitors, regulators, finance, and Human Authority.Whether the completion forecast is supportable and which high-level risk needs escalation, recovery, or contingency.Earlier action on schedule and cost risk without exposing protected information.
2Cost Growth, Responsibility, and Prudence Traceability LedgerA dated public-record ledger joining approved baseline, forecast, drivers, notice, management action, responsibility position, commission evidence, recovery treatment, and unresolved item.Commission staff, owner finance, counsel, auditors, consumer representatives, and executives.Which cost is supported, disputed, deferred, allocated, investigated, or proposed for recovery.Clearer accountability and a more reviewable ratepayer record.
3Continue, Restructure, or Stop Decision BookA controlled executive book comparing continue, change sequence or commercial structure, add oversight, defer, or stop using cost, time, safety authority, reliability, legal duty, and public consequence.Owner board and executives, regulators, finance, counsel, public authorities, and Human Authority.Which lawful path should proceed at each material decision gate.Better protection of public, owner, and ratepayer interests.
Completion Gate

Release controls and honest limits

PASS — Guided proofNine exact tour steps, three-way navigation, and direct evidence cards are present.
PASS — Tangible OptionsExactly three primary outputs name a user, decision, result, and benefit.
PASS — Source separationThe source words and the CFIG interpretation are shown in different boxes.
LIMIT — Evidence boundaryThis is a high-level public-record demonstration. It excludes nonpublic plant data, protected security information, safeguards information, detailed layouts, operating vulnerabilities, and independent nuclear engineering or safety judgments.
LIMIT — Professional roleCFIG organizes records and decision intelligence. It does not replace licensed design, legal, safety, environmental, accounting, or regulatory professionals.
HUMAN AUTHORITYCarl Wilson controls approval, release, reliance, and any later use of this demonstration.
No guarantee: Tangible Options describe defensible decision support. They do not promise a project result or claim that CFIG performed work on the historical project.

RETURN TO THE 13-PROJECT COLLECTION

Return to CFIG Site